I wrote a single sentence comment on an article on the Instructify website, clicked Submit, and got this:
What the??
[Link last checked January 2010]
I wrote a single sentence comment on an article on the Instructify website, clicked Submit, and got this:
What the??
[Link last checked January 2010]
Another great cartoon from Matthew Inman, over at The Oatmeal comics site, this time on how a web design project can descend into hell. Anybody would think he’d done this for a living…
Here’s a taste:
(Click the image to go to the full cartoon, or click this link: http://theoatmeal.com/comics/design_hell)
[Links last checked January 2010]
Are you concerned that web pages and references that you cite may disappear or change? You’re not alone. According to some sources, up to 13% of web pages change, disappear or become inactive within about two years. For casual viewers and readers, this isn’t necessarily a problem. But for researchers, academics, students and the like, it’s a huge problem. At least with a book or journal article, you could pretty much guarantee that someone (or some library), somewhere would have a copy.
So what’s the solution? Well, companies like Google and libraries around the world are trying hard to digitize printed materials, but is anyone looking after the stuff published only on the internet? Yes — and one such group is WebCite.org.
WebCite®, a member of the International Internet Preservation Consortium, is an on-demand archiving system for webreferences (cited webpages and websites, or other kinds of Internet-accessible digital objects), which can be used by authors, editors, and publishers of scholarly papers and books, to ensure that cited webmaterial will remain available to readers in the future. …
A WebCite®-enhanced reference is a reference which contains — in addition to the original live URL (which can and probably will disappear in the future, or its content may change) — a link to an archived copy of the material, exactly as the citing author saw it when he accessed the cited material.
Individual authors, scholars, students can use WebCite for free to create an archive of a web document; journal editors, publishers and libraries are asked to donate a fee (e.g. $1 for each web reference added). And for readers, it’s all free.
WebCite ensures that any page you refer people to will always be there.
[Links last checked January 2010; thanks to Monique S on the STC’s Consultants and Independent Contractors discussion list for alerting me to this resource]
You receive a Word document that’s been through many hands, maybe even several different companies. It is littered with unused styles (typically with weird style names!) and you want to get rid of these styles from your full list of styles once and for all.
There are several ways to get rid of unwanted styles. The method you choose depends on how many you need to get rid of, and the steps vary a little depending on whether you’re using Word 2003 or Word 2007.
Note: You cannot delete the default styles. Well, you can, but it requires some messing around. Check this Microsoft Knowledge Base article on how to do this in Word 2000 — it should apply to later versions too, though I haven’t tried any of their suggestions: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/193536.
If you only have a few styles to delete, it’s probably just as quick to do them one at a time:
Word 2003:
Word 2007:
[Links last checked December 2009]
Everyone seems to be getting on the ‘periodic table as a diagram’ act, including the agile learning people. Here’s a snippet of theirs:
You can see their full diagram here: http://www.knowledgejump.com/agile/periodic.html
Other periodic table examples:
And for a REAL periodic table of elements done in a very informative, visual way, take a look at this one (or click the image below to see it in full):
[Links last checked January 2010]
Got a looming deadline? Then try these tips from Matthew Stibbe at the Bad Language blog:
Full details: http://www.badlanguage.net/how-to-concentrate-on-writing
[Link last checked January 2010]
Someone sends you a long Word document and asks you to check only the changes, which they’ve highlighted. You have limited time so you need to find those highlighted passages quickly.
Here are two ways you can quickly find highlighted text — use the one that best suits your way of working
Zoom out the view of the document and look for pages that contain highlighting, then click on a page and zoom back in again to view and edit the highlighted text.
You can go down to about 10 or 20% to see as many pages as possible without losing the ability to see the pages containing highlights.
To zoom in/out:
Here’s a few pages at 20% zoom — you can see the highlighted section easily:
A highlighted section shows easily at 20% zoom
The other way to find highlighted text is to use the Find function. Find is particularly handy if there’s a lot of highlighting, and you think you might miss some using the zoom function. It’s also handy for finding highlights you can’t see, such as those hiding behind empty paragraph marks or graphics. Both Word 2003 and 2007 work the same way, as do later versions of Word for Windows, such as 365:
At the 2009 WritersUA Conference, Scott McCloud, the guy who created the Google Chrome system documentation in cartoon form, spoke about the challenges of creating documentation in this way (see my summary of his opening session of the conference).
Since then, I’ve become more aware of what seems to be a (slowly?) growing move by some people and organizations towards using cartoons to provide some technical documentation.
Which is all very fine if you happen to be a cartoonist, or even a halfway decent artist. But what about those of us who aren’t either of those things? How can we leverage the value of cartoons when we can’t even draw a straight or curved line?
Well, you could spend a small fortune hiring someone to do your drawings for you, or you try out a couple of free cartoon drawing applications to see if they might be useful:
[Links last checked January 2010]
From the bowels of the Microsoft Research labs comes Image Composite Editor, an:
…advanced panoramic image stitcher [that] takes a set of overlapping photographs of a scene shot from a single camera location and creates a high-resolution panorama incorporating all the source images at full resolution. The stitched panorama can be saved in a wide variety of formats, from common formats like JPEG and TIFF to multi-resolution tiled formats like HD View and Silverlight Deep Zoom.
Image Composite Editor is free, but because it’s from the research labs, it’s not officially supported; however, there is a user forum. It comes in 32-bit and 64-bit flavors.
You can download it from here: http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/redmond/groups/ivm/ICE/
[Links last checked January 2010]
Here’s a short list of links to some bug tracking software:
Wikipedia has a comparison chart of even more:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_issue_tracking_systems
[Links last checked January 2010; thanks to Alan B on the STC’s Consultants and Independent Contractors discussion list for many of these suggestions]